alp (57.5%) surges to lead over l-np (42.5%), page-110

It has room for changes and yet will hit its mark. Is it wise? We'll, it is certainly prudent!

I don't understand why you would continue this line of argument when most economists are supporting spending reform. How can we continue down the path of continually hitting a shrinking nett tax base?

You can argue semantics but the bigger issue is how do you keep economic sustainability when the populist cronies in the senate live in a reality vacuum?