Alternative Metrics, page-2259

  1. 5,549 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1396
    If most retailers start charging customers fees for using BNPL then there is less incentive to switch from credit cards to BNPL. In this situation I feel the only people who would use this sector are the ones who are rejected from using credit cards (sub-prime borrowers). Not a great situation for APT as I'd expect slower uptake as well as increased delinquencies.

    HOWEVER... why would retailers possibly want to pass on this cost? Let me post just one reason why ret
    ailers are using a service like Afterpay:

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/1858/1858230-416a671690549bf0807cb8021d2592ac.jpg
    If you are a retailer and your sales are almost doubling due to customers using Afterpay, you wouldn't want to do anything to disincentivise your customers from using it. Imagine you make $1000 a day, and a recruiter approaches you and says he can get you a job that pays $1940 a day, but it'll cost you $50 a day.

    To sum it up, if retailers passed on the costs it would undermine BNPL and be very bad news to APT, but it's unlikely this will happen IMO.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.