amayapampa npv anyone?, page-2

oh come on guys,
you'd reply to a negative comment faster than this,
or give a thumbs up to a 'nice' sounding thread title.
Is a fair question too difficult to answer?

lets have some realistic numbers...
we can be 'transparent' for a change.

"pits, transitions and gold prices"...
"...proactive investors"...
all good 'media-type" bites, but where's the substance?
surely this is a fair question?

I'm quite happy to be shown to be wrong, if numbers turn out better than I suspect.

Real proactive investors check these sorts of things out before they "jump off a cliff", so to speak.
it's pretty commonsensical, really.
RAU must have run these sorts of numbers internally, if they're "for real" about enticing investment into these projects... so 'the punter' can surely run them also.

Of course, it's always easier to raise other peoples money.
"a sucker born each minute", perhaps is true.
or how 'bout some fantastical oppies, for directors?..
real cash?

people like ctindale, aussie joe, bigtoe etc, really do look as though they have a strong point, with the issues they raise, if all the rau 'punters' have, is "propaganda" to go on, in evaluating RAU prospects.

show us all the sensibility you like to talk about.