Goldies, I can't see the logic in your statements because you say both contain lithium and both require different extraction methods. Its lithium oxide not spodumene or amblygonite that is required as battery grade substance. Surely the argument should be based on the most economic method of extracting the lithium oxide from either structure and comparing apples with apples.
So I don't see KezzadOrk misleading uniformed investors when we put this in the context of economics which is the study of the allocation of scarce resources. Investors should be informed rather than making emotional decisions based on spin or lack of vision to compare alternative uses.
CGM have a few irons in the fire, not just lithium ions (pardon the pun). The have a suite of exploration and results to come, including areas containing spodumene if that is a fixation at present.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CGM
- Amblygonite and it's economic uses
Amblygonite and it's economic uses, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 45 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)