I think that the company's AISC has taken into account the by-product credits for poly-metal miners. Thus, if one uses gold-equivalent ounces, then the total operating expenses must be used to divide against the GEOs to calculate AISC. Alternatively, the company can use gold ounces and then the total operating expenses is adjusted to take into account the credits earned from other metals to give the AISC.
To my knowledge, most companies use the latter when calculating their AISC. That is why AMI had been operating at below $1 000/oz AISC for the first half of the year when they had higher production volume, because the by-product credits helped in volume and also when the base metal prices were higher.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AMI
- AMI versus GOR. Which valuation is wrong?
AMI
aurelia metals limited
Add to My Watchlist
2.56%
!
20.0¢

AMI versus GOR. Which valuation is wrong?, page-9
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
20.0¢ |
Change
0.005(2.56%) |
Mkt cap ! $338.5M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
19.5¢ | 20.0¢ | 19.5¢ | $128.0K | 649.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 84245 | 19.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
20.0¢ | 576837 | 16 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 43300 | 0.195 |
35 | 1750160 | 0.190 |
23 | 1440466 | 0.185 |
21 | 1266820 | 0.180 |
13 | 281571 | 0.175 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.200 | 518132 | 8 |
0.205 | 346596 | 7 |
0.210 | 827432 | 11 |
0.215 | 176381 | 7 |
0.220 | 349750 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 18/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AMI (ASX) Chart |