Horn absolutely mauled the British fighter, should have been...

First 117 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Stiltskin

932 Posts.

1

30/12/17

17:33

Post #: 29951345
Share

Originally posted by prosperman ↑

If you think it was clearly out you are looking at it through rose colored glasses,
or watching another catch.Blind Freddie knows if it was so clear no need to go upstairs.
I have watch it numerous times and one would not know if it was grassed or not.
Decisions going Australia way are not unusual. Horn `S last 2 fight have been very dubious on the scorecard.While he won the last won by a 11 rd tko ,as many called the fight close the scorecards-has a 8 points difference.
The pac-man fight was one of the worst decision anyone has has watch boxing and not bias would be ashamed ??Similar to a Stan the man(kick boxing) decision when he fought a Jap years ago when the whole crowd rightly booed,for ages--now home crowd decision are given no matter had bad the beating.Even the ref said if you don`t start defending yourself I will call the fight of? I will never listen about a decision going against Australia overseas again.Just deserts as the same bias happens here. The original decision was out--the review should have been given to the batsmen--as it clearly showed that one could not be sure it he catch it clearly.

Expand

Horn absolutely mauled the British fighter, should have been stopped far earlier than it was.
The Pacquaio fight was close but Horn was more agressive and more dominant in the centre of the ring. Pacquaio is no longer capable of gaining dominance in this space. He's also no longer capable of getting a stoppage.
None of it has anything to do with cricket.
Upvote

Reply