analysis of top 20 changes & conclusions, page-15

I have an idea that a lot of the selling is coming from those who bought during the AFHL fiasco, which was designed that way in my opinion, there were a multitude of sales during that time, yet the top twenty hardly changed, and please don't tell me they were small shareholders buying? because I don't believe that for one minute, and if whomever was behind it could influence the ASX and ASIC then a small thing like non disclosure isn't going to mean much is it?