I think you will find Cornell as note holders had the right to appoint R&M, basically they take the assets to satisfy note holders first.
FH still remain as administrators.
In order for someone to appoint R&M they must have had priority or security, only one I can think of is Cornell.
Doesn't change much from shareholders perspective.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- and ask the asx
I think you will find Cornell as note holders had the right to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CMR (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online