Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

invalid process is neither innocent or guilty. His God,...

First 175 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
sandbar

215 Posts.

5

08/04/20

12:54

Post #: 43949226
Share

Originally posted by bcr: ↑

Now that I have actually read the High Courts decision, I paid particular attention to the wording of their Orders:

Source: http://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/showCase/2020/HCA/12

Their use of the words "quash" and "acquittal", I can only interpret to mean that the charges have been annulled as if they had never been laid in the first place.

That seems to me to be that, as a result of the High Court's Order, that Pell is "innocent": Meaning that they have NOT given a ruling of "Not Guilty": They have declared the whole process invalid.

I don't agree with the High Court, but that's their decision.

Expand

invalid process is neither innocent or guilty. His God, conscience and/or further information may or may not help decide
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...

First 175 Last

SPONSORED BY