Andrews, the disgrace you can rely on, page-119

  1. 87,983 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 75
    oh, so in the light of my reference

    you NOW realise that it's hate speech BY LAW

    but, you wish to continue to defend a person breaking the law by using hate speech - AND you wish to discontinue the discussion now because you cannot get around or handle the fact that a religious nutter homophobe IS ENGAGING IN HATE SPEECH

    and, is about to be awarded a national recognition -

    which is - by any REASONABLE person's values -------- thoroughly offensive -

    we should NOT be awarding national awards to law breaking people who engage in hate speech


    which part of this is difficult??????
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.