Ann: 10.7m @ 13.7% Cu-Equiv. intersected in South Shoot, page-19

As Mike said, the situation is also a little confusing, as to whether the holes are new holes or wedges of existing.
For example the two that pierce the Original shoot, I would expect to be wedges off an earlier one (a six & nine, iron, but definitely not a sand wedge. Ha, Ha). He doesn't say what happened to the rest were they terminated or missed?

Even when he said al holes but one previously hid mineable mineralization I find a somewhat difficult to reconcile. Never the less I'm very happy with the what we have got and the pierce point in the South Shoot.

Coming along nicely. My/our cup runneth over.

All IMVHO.