Click bait? Based on what exactly?Let’s stick to facts , not...

Click bait? Based on what exactly?

Let’s stick to facts , not lazy labels.

Meeka’s (MEK) announcement is grounded in substance:

•Full JORC compliance – Includes complete Table 1 reporting: drilling methods, sampling, QA/QC, and assay details. Most juniors don’t even come close.

•Named Competent Person – Signed off by James Lawrence, a qualified full-time geologist. That’s real accountability, not anonymous CP sign-offs.

•Detailed drill results – Includes exact intercepts, downhole depths, grades, widths, and coordinates. This is transparent, data-rich reporting.

•Operational relevance – These results exend a pit that’s already being mined and support upcoming processing plant commissioning. It’s directly tied to production and cash flow, not speculation.

Now compare that to Dateline Resources (DTR):

•Recycled news and hype about “securing” a permit that had already been in place since acquisition.

•Recently announced funding for a BFS that had already been publicly flagged, old news repackaged to generate hype.

•Frequent announcements with minimal technical data and little follow-up or substantiation.

If anything, there are many such companies that leans on promotional hype. Meeka, by contrast, is conservative, technically sound, and focused on delivering.

Calling this “click bait” shows a lack of understanding about how real mining progress is reported.