Click bait? Based on what exactly?
Let’s stick to facts , not lazy labels.
Meeka’s (MEK) announcement is grounded in substance:
•Full JORC compliance – Includes complete Table 1 reporting: drilling methods, sampling, QA/QC, and assay details. Most juniors don’t even come close.
•Named Competent Person – Signed off by James Lawrence, a qualified full-time geologist. That’s real accountability, not anonymous CP sign-offs.
•Detailed drill results – Includes exact intercepts, downhole depths, grades, widths, and coordinates. This is transparent, data-rich reporting.
•Operational relevance – These results exend a pit that’s already being mined and support upcoming processing plant commissioning. It’s directly tied to production and cash flow, not speculation.
Now compare that to Dateline Resources (DTR):
•Recycled news and hype about “securing” a permit that had already been in place since acquisition.
•Recently announced funding for a BFS that had already been publicly flagged, old news repackaged to generate hype.
•Frequent announcements with minimal technical data and little follow-up or substantiation.
If anything, there are many such companies that leans on promotional hype. Meeka, by contrast, is conservative, technically sound, and focused on delivering.
Calling this “click bait” shows a lack of understanding about how real mining progress is reported.
(20min delay)