sf120 said in a post that at 9 minute nigel talks he is 100%...

sf120 said in a post that at 9 minute nigel talks he is 100% sure about the 75%. i did not saw the video. But when its true, maybe this could be a reason. I ask my self could this be a act of destroying some evidence? if it turns out differently than said, that he will not be a target for legal actions? In the presentation stands just good legal title, not 100% sure. But i am not a lawyer, maybe i am completely wrong. But anything what have been said must be wrong, why else would anyone want it to delete? Mhh