One would have thought the official increased resource calcs for Epanko would be comforting to project stakeholders as well as shareholders.
For example: the government of Tanzania, which is both a stakeholder and shareholder; BASF; Thyssen Krupp; the Koreans, Japanese and Vietnamese checking out the product quality; others in Europe & possibly USA; and KfW. That is not to mention prospective shareholders and stakeholders and possible providers of subordinated loans.
Undoubtedly it will test the imagination of those with a creative negative bent to come up with a downside spin, but I am sure they can do it.
Ann: 127% increase in Epanko Mineral Resource, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 22 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EGR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
12.5¢ |
Change
0.010(8.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $56.75M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 12.5¢ | 12.5¢ | 12.5¢ | $13.15K | 105.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 140000 | 12.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 12.5¢ | 141593 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.07am 17/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EGR (ASX) Chart |