I don't think the question should be whether we're near the peak or not, really. I really don't know. There are so many macro factors at play. Does anyone know?
The point that matters is that the only "PE" that matters, from a valuation perspective, is one where the "E" tells you something about equivalent annual earnings, on the basis of those earnings being sustained ad infinitum. Then the inverse of the PE will tell us something about your earnings yield based on something akin to "earnings power".
Essentially, an E is only worth the paper it's written on if it tells us something about the present-value of ALL the Es that are comming. Why should 1, 2, 3 or 5 years of E be your basis for valuation?
Hence the question of "cyclicality".
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LYL
- Ann: 1HFY2024 Investor Presentation
Ann: 1HFY2024 Investor Presentation, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LYL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$12.23 |
Change
-0.030(0.24%) |
Mkt cap ! $486.0M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$12.30 | $12.30 | $12.05 | $528.2K | 43.48K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | $12.13 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$12.23 | 1335 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 12.130 |
1 | 147 | 12.110 |
1 | 147 | 12.100 |
1 | 147 | 12.080 |
2 | 1752 | 12.060 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
12.230 | 1335 | 2 |
12.250 | 147 | 1 |
12.270 | 147 | 1 |
12.280 | 147 | 2 |
12.350 | 500 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 02/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LYL (ASX) Chart |