You always say that the pps wouldn’t have re-rated from 4c to 15c if the results at that time weren’t excellent.
Why is that price move meaningful or a true reflection of the progress of the company, but the subsequent drop (and continued drop to where we are now) is not?
You can’t have it both ways - either the market is right or it isn’t - you’ve previously stated many times that it isn't (because the pps hasn’t accounted for a range of positive developments), so why was it right when the share price “re-rated” to 15c? Because it suits your narrative? The logic makes no sense.
(and yes, I had to take you off ignore to be able to read these forums).
IMU Price at posting:
2.8¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)