Hole 2 is far more likely to "hit" than hole 1. Why? Look at the...

Hole 2 is far more likely to "hit" than hole 1. Why?

Look at the press release dated 21 January 2019 - "Underground Sampling at Chuscal". Figure 3 in particular. Note in the middle the high grade channel samples - 160 g/t, 252 g/t, 48.9 g/t, 31.7 g/t, etc....

Where is Hole 2 aimed at? Look at the press release 30 October 2019 - Figure 1. Where is the Hole 2 line traced as going? Straight through the high grade area of the old mine workings in Figure 3 referred to above ......

Now, I'm no rocket scientist.........