The specific gravity they predominantly used 1.64 t/m3 to 1.76...

The specific gravity they predominantly used 1.64 t/m3 to 1.76 t/m3 were materially lower than what I used in my calculations (2.6) to get the 3.5-5.2m oz range for the resource. Adjusting it down for this spec gravity would have given 2.3-3.4m oz range (i.e. 3.5-5.2 * Average (1.64, 1.76)/2.6) and be closer to the actual est. Regardless, the eventual number was a bit disappointing.

Anyhow, no mention of Lucky winner at all in the Ann? I wonder if the deal has fallen through