RE-POST, sorry folks; now with the Table... Observations on 3...

RE-POST, sorry folks; now with the Table...

Observations on 3 AGM resolutions:
Agree with your conclusions, BlackPeter. I’ve constructed this table below of the AGM votes, calculating what % of total TAP shareholders voted the same way as the negative votes of NGP/Mr Yenbamroong.

It’s clear (see Column 3) that only a few (3-5) million of TAP’s 243 million shares voted against the resolutions, along with NGP/Mr Yenbamroong. If he were to go ahead with a Board spill I would expect even less shareholders would vote his way given NGP/his behaviour, on so many fronts.

BTW, NGP/he obviously didn’t pay the US$27million Default Notice within the 60 days, so the Operator will be pursuing that.

	Column 1	Column 2	Column 3	Column 4	Column 5
0	Resolution​	Votes​ For​	Votes Against by ALL OTHERS holding 79.88% of TAP’s 243,288,234 shares​ ​	Votes Against ​ by NGP/​ Yenbamroong – 19.97% of TAP’s 243M shares​	Comment​
1	Re-elect Doug Schwebel	94,559,887	3,167,133​ (ie. 1.3% of TAP shares on issue)​	48,580,575	NGP/Yenbamroong vote inconsistent with previous indications not to oppose Dr Schwebel. Beware …
2	Adopt Rem. Report	77,879,909	5,628,634 (ie. 2.3% of TAP shares on issue)	48,580,575	-
3	Renew Proportional Takeover Provisions in Constitution	94,135,131	3,681,272 (ie. 1.5% of TAP shares on issue)	48,580,575	NGP/Yenbamroong voted down renewal of existing protection for smaller shareholders. Beware …