JCoure,
I don't think that is correct. As I understand, the remuneration report vote is not binding. However if a company gets two reports voted against i.e. More than 25% of votes against the Remuneration report in 2 straight years - this triggers a board spill.
This has happened before, but most cases the significant shareholders vote the board back on again. It does send a message, but it's a bit toothless.
slooi1
JCoure, I don't think that is correct. As I understand, the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PAC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$10.83 |
Change
0.130(1.21%) |
Mkt cap ! $565.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $10.70 | $10.88 | $10.69 | $424.9K | 39.43K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 147 | $10.78 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $10.88 | 130 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PAC (ASX) Chart |