you have made your point about Vlad getting shares 100 times already... you are stuck on repeat, its old, something new please
Just to reiterate - without it, we wouldnt even be talking about VB, not as an SRN asset, at least.. IMO it is a minimal risk scenario given what's in shareholder's best interest also appears to be in the interest of Vlad.. Have you forgotten how many shares he holds? Why are you so scared of Vlad having shares?
Plenty happening across multiple projects...
Plenty to like in this one single slide.
Vlad has been fiercely invested at every pass. The market has tictok brain and chases the quick dollars, no one wants the unexciting, labourious, long haul story to production... Everyone wants initial discovery phase - 100m at 95% <INSERT MINERAL> per tonne etc etc ahaha.
Vanadium is under-performing in the current market and there are macro economic factors that have transpired over the last 2-3 years to drive what we have seen across a lot of the speccy market, if not market in general - all in line with the chart IMO. So we got a bit of a perfect storm pushing the price down...
It can all change in an instant IMO.
But yeah, point is, Vlad has shares, has vehemently supported SRN up to now and provided one of it's most prospective, most advanced assets..You know how project acquisition works, so why would you think it is any different with VB? Was SRN entitled to Victory Bore simply through association with Vlad? Because SRN had nothing to do with VB previously. Should we have got it for free?
12m VS 1.7B, c'mon..
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
