The shareholders and board of directors have both demonstrated...

The shareholders and board of directors have both demonstrated integrity during this failed 249F.

After being rejected by shareholders, they are now coming back with a 249D. Unlike the 249F costs which are borne by the requisitioners , a 249D will make Ten Sixty Four pay with company funds the costs incurred.

I am shocked that the activist shareholders have chosen to do a 249D instead of doing a 249F.
Shareholders will be paying the costs of what is now very likely to be a second failed attempt to replace board members.

X64action why did you choose to make shareholders pay for your attempt to replace board members with this 249D ?

If Vitrinite has any funds, they should immediately replace this 249D with a 249F and pay the costs incurred themselves!