I understand the saprolite contains lithium, however that is...

I understand the saprolite contains lithium, however that is different to reporting pegmatite stringers in the saprolite. I posted something here a while back, mid last year, before it was tested, that I felt the saprolite was lithium based before that was shown to be correct. The theory I have is the pegmatite stringers in hole 3 have not been fully weathered as per what we saw in holes 1 and 2 because in hole 3 the pegmatite stringers themselves are thicker, meaning GPP could be moving in the right direction in finding the main body of the pegmatite (assuming normal weathering conditions throughout the area). Just a theory and wild guess. All IMO