I disagree it being rich. Unfortunately, people have vested interests either way in stocks. How do you know if people aren't trying to deliberately mislead? Someone could be trying to unravel their position, but posting positivity to ensure it happens with the highest cost recovery.
I will always assume the best in people, but objective evidence is always nice. Is it not?
100% I appreciate people sharing the info they obtain via email or text. But how am I to know if it's true?
Ann: 2D Seismic Identifies Multiple Prospects in Dande Formation, page-127
Add IVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
5.4¢ |
Change
-0.005(8.47%) |
Mkt cap ! $76.56M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 5.9¢ | 6.2¢ | 5.4¢ | $233.4K | 4.025M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 70999 | 5.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6¢ | 570000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 13/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
5.5¢ |
Change
-0.005 ( 5.17 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 5.9¢ | 6.2¢ | 5.4¢ | 1733559 | ||
| Last updated 15.59pm 13/06/2024 ? | |||||
| IVZ (ASX) Chart |