Why do think that non participating parties to a well for example would ever want to use a buyback into a sole risk well of the sort provided in JOAs? As you should know, those provisions normally provide for a buy back in for a multiple of the costs incurred by the sole risk party. The AIEN draft envisages that might be up to 700% of the costs incurred by the sole risk party.
I think you will find that the production from a sole risk well belongs to the sole risk party either exclusively or up to a predetermined limit giving them a return on their investment. We don’t know here what the JOA says but it is unlikely to forbid sole risk operations. I doubt that it would have been in Strike’s interests to prevent those when they first farmed in.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- STX
- Ann: 2Q FY24 Quarterly Report & Appendix 5B
Ann: 2Q FY24 Quarterly Report & Appendix 5B, page-265
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 83 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
20.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $572.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
20.5¢ | 21.0¢ | 20.0¢ | $1.096M | 5.415M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
32 | 2599619 | 20.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
20.5¢ | 451618 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
31 | 2569619 | 0.200 |
26 | 1945794 | 0.195 |
63 | 2806081 | 0.190 |
19 | 1309998 | 0.185 |
29 | 1440203 | 0.180 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.205 | 451618 | 5 |
0.210 | 588996 | 9 |
0.215 | 1252681 | 18 |
0.220 | 997218 | 17 |
0.225 | 979575 | 10 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 02/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
STX (ASX) Chart |