Not a lot to say here that you guys have not already covered -...

Not a lot to say here that you guys have not already covered - I'm with @Kalenn who commented on Fig 4 which he said he posted earlier - well I missed it but had a good idea which one it would be - here it is again.

IMO we have a great new tenement in Ccarhua 1, the NW one of the six new tenements, and looking at BHP's ground to the south east I see similarities even on surface. I wonder why BHP did not get in the bun fight for the four which were in moratorium.
For Inca to get all six would be fantastic - but with so much work for Inca to do already I can see Peruvians thinking Anglo might give the best shot quicker.



Here are some of the the new applications - circled is the ground I like. The intersecting faults (dotted yellow lines) grab me by the alpacas too.

Inca has a good case to argue - saying they have stood by Peru over years of excitement and disappointment - they have proved their ability to CR and have a deep knowledge of the geology in the area. And they can point to the rock chips from Ccarhua1 saying 'we have already got most of this
- give us CCarhua 2 to complete the suite'. Anglo has not got that one to argue.


Good luck Inca - Good luck ALL.