Nate0
Absolutely right - they have been pretty good at hitting their timelines a couple of weeks over isn't a big thing - obviously never owned an exploration miner or a Biotech stock, 1 or 2 weeks late is considered on time.
However:
Yesterday's announcement on review seems perfunctory and rushed.
No explanation why 18 wafers were received instead of the planned 12.
No explanation why another non-platform lot was performed.
Seems to me like the team are more interested in the wafers and informing us plebs is just a tick the box exercise. Like trying to get a word edgeways out of teenager mjshackl the day his parents plonked a new 486 on his desk.
Nate0Absolutely right - they have been pretty good at hitting...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
