And here is my point...there is ample data available...4DS have the hard data and have provided a summary of key metrics, which is sufficient to make a clear case that the tech stands to be revolutionary:
- DRAM-like speed, recently increased by up to 10x - that IS faster then DRAM - no ifs, buts, or maybes.
- Retention many orders of magnitude greater than DRAM
- Energy consumption, many orders of magnitude less than DRAM
- Endurance less than DRAM, but many orders of magnitude greater than NAND. But the increased retention over DRAM, means 4DS could have the same effective endurance due to reduced cycling.
- Cost, significantly less than DRAM
- Scalability, significantly greater than DRAM and NAND.
Every one of these metrics, while not specific, are accurate enough to understand the potential market opportunities. The effective endurance would appear to be the only metrics that stands between 4DS being better than DRAM.
But you can't actually interpret this data and make your own decision. No, despite all your research you continue to rely on emotion and listen to opinions based on historical M&A deals, which have absolutely no similarities to what 4DS are developing.
If the megabit chip demonstrates the metrics above, then there is absolutely no way it would sell for 30c a share. You are either suffering from some form of cognitive impairment or conflict of interest to entertain this as a plausible scenario.
