Ann: 6th Supplementary Prospectus, page-137

The classic use of ‘this person doesn’t agree with every single thing I say, they must be working for a competitor and are trying to run my company into the ground’ is one of the worst arguements you could use to counter a point put forward by a contrarian, or even a holder who is more cautious of their investment than others. The mods encourage a healthy debate between people with differing views because that’s what it is, healthy debate. To only look at the viewpoint of people ramping the company up 24/7 is a pretty bad investment strategy. The same could be said by only looking at the view of a contrarian. There are good, reasonable points on both sides of the argument.