Does this mean the underwriter/sub-underwriter gets the full shortfall over shareholders who applied for shortfall?
That is not "underwriting", which is supposed to only kick in if there is a LOWER amount applied for than they were seeking. In this case there was MORE applied for than they were seeking and the underwriter should walk away with only their underwriting fee (if any).
Pretty disappointed that we get shafted in favour of their mates.
Does this mean the underwriter/sub-underwriter gets the full...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add GMD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.02 |
Change
-0.040(1.94%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.266B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.03 | $2.05 | $2.00 | $4.207M | 2.085M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1825 | $2.02 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.03 | 44004 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GMD (ASX) Chart |