Ann: 92 Feet of Gas Pay in Borba 1-7 Well, page-119

First 119 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jwgloede

312 Posts.

249

17/03/21

07:23

Post #: 51820844
Share

Originally posted by TheCaptain999: ↑

Hello board friends.

I have been here a number of times and this is the time when we either get paranoid or excited and usually between heart beats.

just the facts ma’am. We know we have discovered gas and more than we expected in the first zone. This is huge as the well has been considerably de-risked.

We are in a proven hydrocarbon basin that is gas prone. Offset wells have produced commercially for decades

We are chasing an elephant that is hiding in the deeper zones that has not been extensively explored in the basin (info from another poster)

We know that the sales pipeline is a stones throw away and has spare capacity to take our gas and the tie in costs would be minimal that can lead to the conclusion that even small flow rates would be commercial.

We know that the well is being drilled professionally and safely. Thank the lord

We know that GJ’s geological model has been confirmed by the drilling to date and we know he is displaying enthusiasm but in an under stated manner. No hype just confidence.

We know we have thousands of feet of gas bearing sands ahead of us and we have 13 bright spots to drill through.

Thats all we know now.... however from my experience that is more than expected and I am as happy as a puppy with two peckers

The Captain

Expand

Hello @TheCaptain999

A few quick questions if I may?

The IR for the Trough 2-3 states:
U1 2.0Bscf (Low)
U2 6.3Bscf (Best)
U3 17.7Bscf (High)

Noting that we have 92 feet of Log Pay (not flow tested yet) how does this compare to the estimates within the IR?

What does 92 feet, if proven to "Flow" relate to in terms of Bscf? U1 / U2 / U3 or much higher??

It was mentioned that this preliminary data obtained is more than double what SGC were expecting to find in the first zones. Is more than "double" mean, more than double U1 / U2 or U3?

The IR has Bscf estimates, these estimates must relate to a certain "thickness" of a potential reservoir, does it not?

Appreciate your time to respond, enjoying your commentary as we drill.

JW

SGC Price at posting: 8.8¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
11 Upvote

1 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Week 42 Wrap: HotCopper's top picks; new ASX 200 record; world yawns at war

What's causing the cost-of-living crisis, and how to navigate it

MTH

Mithril's drilling in Mexico picks up silver at 997g/t, gold at 28g/t

TLG

Talga Group wins key permit for flagship graphite mine in Sweden

NVU

Nanoveu surges 10% after benchmark testing for new AI chip begins

SNX

Sierra Nevada raises $2M for silver exploration at Blackhawk

SWP

Swoop lobs $18M offer at microcap telecom Vonex – in which it holds 19.9%

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

M4M

Macro, Norden set up transport solutions initiative for West Pilbara

IRX

InhaleRX snags $38.5M in funding from VC biotech funder Clendon