Hi all.Was doing a little bit more looking at the modelling of...

Hi all.
Was doing a little bit more looking at the modelling of these anomalies that both Wa1 and ENR have.
It is never easy to find and from one survey to the next, even though they look the same, They may not be.
BUT- Carapateena was discovered by similar methods and it is interesting to look at that discovery.

I thought it interesting and have copied some pics from that data which are below.
















From the above we can determine some of the important surveys and how they can be accurate, ( but not always ).

The next pic is from the Luni Gravity anomaly which measures 3km x 1km.




Now we have the ENR Falcon gravity results in this pic below.
In the section that over laps the boundary into WA1 tenement, you can see the 3km x 1km anomaly of Luni.
NOW, cast your eye to the scale at the bottom and you can see 20km.
I have drawn in a red line, as close to scale as I can that is equivalent to that 20km scale across that anomaly.
I'm not bad at maths but I think anyone ( good at maths or not ) can see the size of the gravity anomaly comparisons here.
I am sure that those 2 smaller anomalies to the RHS would measure at least 3km x 3km but closer to 5x5 imho



Get the picture?
Pardon the pun.
Now to see if any of it is mineralised.
Kind regards, Wack.