Classic deflection.
You only wanted to talk about the tailings dam and the issues around that.
You used that analysis to state that this would NEVER (your emphasis) be mined.
And now that analysis has been debunked you want to switch to some other issue. How can you have any credibility when the last, very aggressive, premise was proven to be just a bunch of misinformation?
It’s funny because some of the stuff you post sounds pretty logical and well thought out. But it’s not. The whole series of diatribes was based on a tailings dam that hasn’t been in use for 40 years. The company comprehensively destroyed your argument.
As I said before, man up on that massive mistake first.
Classic deflection. You only wanted to talk about the tailings...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(3.03%) |
Mkt cap ! $31.63M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.5¢ | 3.7¢ | 3.2¢ | $640.8K | 18.51M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 4689383 | 3.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3¢ | 132167 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 13/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SGQ (ASX) Chart |