If you are on your desktop, have a check out of https://knr.gl/...

If you are on your desktop, have a check out of https://knr.gl/ (probably bookmark this) and there are several articles pertaining to the Public Hearing for the GGG "Kuannersuit/Kvanefjeld" project. (translate from danish to english); public perception of Uranium by-product is quite negative, we are fortunate we are some 130 km away - and township is abandoned, with different ore minerals with no Uranium by-product. At time of reading their project looks pretty dead in the water based on public perception (threats of violence by hardliners in the mix).

nodefamatory content can be brought into HC./p/government-of-greenland-help-stopping-the-kuannersuit-mining-project-in-south-greenland?recruiter=294862337&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=psf_combo_share_abi&utm_term=share_petition&recruited_by_id=d493eb60-f830-11e4-9aa7-79bdb6ecb9e4

The change org is interesting, shows the public sentiment (obvious negative bias against uranium mining in Greenland, some comments against mining in general). It is important to take these into consideration.

it's abundantly clear we need the services of a moderate that is an environmentalist/science background and is local to South Greenland to join the leadership team. We are lucky as going forward we can learn from the mistakes of GGG; and from my research there has been a cereal box of cluster-fut-ups; thus their 13 year Odyssey. They have some interesting substantial shareholders which I would not be surprised to make it our on register. Here hoping all this paper work is managed by the next Annual Reporting season, so can reflect on the financials.

I'm of the view we may leap frog them in project progress - once all the purchased research is reviewed - and conversions are complaint.