I hope it goes that way.
I have to give you (yes another PEN anecdote).
Pen does have an aquifer exemption, however the contentions are still being debated.
The sitting judge is even quoted as saying, water doesn't flow up hill (re PAM Viv case) & the monitoring wells create a hydrostatic zone of higher pressure (clean water) zone to contain the luxivant whilst being drawn from the production well(s)...Yet here we are 3 years later hammering out the last of the contentions.
The science doesn't support the petitioners, NRC/ agreement state is effectively the rule maker, yet headaches prevail.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BLR
- Ann: Acquisition Update
Ann: Acquisition Update , page-26
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)