De-risking production is useful at least, changing it to 5 years from 7 years or never. The road, and improving economics and confidence of RPM area.
But people thinking 2-3 years are probably not being realistic. Why would production happen before a realistic timeframe for PFS+further study+funding+construction+startup? They can't exactly jump straight to a small plant without even PFS. Would somebody be willing to hand over the money for that? To mine, having barely reached measured stage for 1/5 resources in the immediate area?
Ann: Additional Highly Prospective Claims Staked at Estelle, page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NVA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
15.5¢ |
Change
0.005(3.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $37.75M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 16.0¢ | 16.0¢ | 15.0¢ | $12.60K | 80.89K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 72834 | 15.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 15.5¢ | 2479 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.35pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NVA (ASX) Chart |