always good to have someone else help pay for exploration costs when undertaking work on conceptual targets.
just an idea, but how about working up the firm prospects hav already have eg iron ore and uranium, rather than try to add high risk conceptual targets to the mix?
either way i am certainly looking forward to a string of exploration results both inside and external to the deal with oz minerals.
Ann: ADI Support For Benagerie Dyke Exploration, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add HAV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
17.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $55.41M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 17.5¢ | 17.5¢ | 17.5¢ | $4.375K | 25K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 99145 | 17.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0¢ | 42105 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.51am 26/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| HAV (ASX) Chart |