All they've done is present their 'DNA assisting' data at a conference - they haven't shown or claimed that the drug actually repairs DNA - if it did, it would state that in the release and 'blockbuster' would be a word that could be used. You're seeing something there that isn't in the release or their results and somehow believe that the British Association of Dermatologists are endorsing your view when they're just passively looking at data showing nothing much spectacular.
All they've done is present their 'DNA assisting' data at a...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 63 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CUV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$13.58 |
Change
-0.100(0.73%) |
Mkt cap ! $679.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $13.75 | $13.90 | $13.34 | $1.163M | 86.04K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 905 | $13.53 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $13.60 | 235 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 07/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CUV (ASX) Chart |