I've been thinking about this presentation from the chairman of Endiama, and about the correlation study that was undertaken for the Luaxe kimberlite, and how they had established that Luaxe was not responsible for any of the known alluvial deposits.
I have absolutely no idea what's required for this correlation study, or the level of accuracy but to ask a naive question - is this something that can be undertaken at Lulo, for the diamonds recovered from the kimberlite exploration to date and/or in the future, to determine which are the source kimberlite(s) for the alluvial diamonds?
Or in the case that L259 does contain diamonds, perhaps it's an obvious inference to make.
Ann: Africa Down Under Presentation-LOM.AX, page-56
Add LOM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(2.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.18M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 4.3¢ | 4.3¢ | 4.2¢ | $6.548K | 154.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 240000 | 4.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4¢ | 112000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.08am 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LOM (ASX) Chart |