I agree and that's issue with the information provided. If the air con, or forklift etc break down, NXT has to replace/fix them. They have no choice. However, the accounts appear to be saying that maintenance capex is >99% less than depreciation in FY23 (and has been throughout it's history).
So I think that there are two possible explanations for this:
1) NXT has been incredibly lucky, and their equipment has out-performed significantly. In which case, there is bound to be a huge cash hit in the next 5 years when maintenance needs begin to catch up with the accumulated depreciation; OR
2) As you said, NXT is bundling in growth and maintenance capex together in their statements.
I'm pretty sure it's the latter. But that goes to my point. I find it difficult to figure out how well the established sites such as M1 are performing as the company reports on EBITDA, not EBIT and provides no info on maintenance vs growth capex.
Just my 2 cents. DYOR
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NXT
- Ann: AGM - CEO's Address
Ann: AGM - CEO's Address, page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NXT (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$17.22 |
Change
-0.080(0.46%) |
Mkt cap ! $11.02B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$17.27 | $17.32 | $17.14 | $17.13M | 995.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 2361 | $17.17 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$17.25 | 1225 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 346 | 17.150 |
2 | 2034 | 17.140 |
2 | 1460 | 17.130 |
4 | 2664 | 17.100 |
2 | 977 | 17.090 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
17.250 | 1225 | 1 |
17.260 | 15702 | 1 |
17.400 | 928 | 1 |
17.430 | 7000 | 1 |
17.490 | 789 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
NXT (ASX) Chart |