Ann: AGM Presentation , page-3

Craigrussell, Agreed, not up to its usual reporting standard. However, it has in the past been guilty of not providing any commentary on poor drilling results it has just put the results (NSI) in the drilling results table.
When it first reported on SFRD436 it was described as 10m of trace to blebby sulphides and we now have a combined 32m of anomalous Ni & Cu but no hole depth - diagram suggests reported mineralisation is shallow
For an area described as a possible "paradigm changer", the messages coming out are decidedly mixed.

Go Cats!