Ann: AGM Presentation, page-40

@The_Earl_of_Loxley

I was following on from the concerns raised by @Relaxed punter who stated that Vingo was paid a $400,000 fee at the time for delivering a non-binding agreement that may not result in anything for the company nor the shareholders.

He sought clarification from SH and couldn't get it. I never said that I'm just quoting.

IMO if that's the way things are done in China then why wouldn't he have just answered clearly @Relaxed punter 's query.

I think paying someone actually anyone for that matter $400,000 for not delivering a concrete result for the company or it's shareholders is excessive.

On top of this he's getting paid to be the marketing /off take person so how much are the shareholders actually paying for these non-binding agreements?

I think it's more than a fair question IMO