The reason atcor went up in value is it was an atcor submission by the clinical physicians asscoiation.ie the evidence meeting all the criteria was compiled and provided based on current atcor machine use by physicians and effectively was solely for the atcor device.
The Ucm 'me too' announcement is claiming that as the code ruling did not specify atcors device in its actual decision notes theirs is 'similar' enough to hopefully benefit from the ruling also. This is a let's face it a hopeful at best claim which has yet to be tested and proven, the final ruling may even specify device.
Ie - that's why Ucm has not gone up in the same way ACG has.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.642M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 400000 | 1.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7¢ | 599988 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.21pm 14/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| UCM (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable