@aks4058 both you and
@DreadPirateRoberts appear to miss my post to
@retiredyoung
read that. ie im not expecting anything nor am i asking for anything. stop playing the man and play the ball. it doesnt speak well of either of you.
im giving you an objective view on what i think funds and brokers would need to see to re-engage with stock to push it materiallly up - based on my knowledge of how they think about companies.
that has nothing to do with what is internally expected reasonable what woudl represent good progress etc etc. im surprised at both of you for not recognising the difference.
think clearly
as for more established companies - no thats not correct
all BUD does is data mgt. so the idea they don;t have a host of comps they could put in front of investors after 15 months of Ohm installations is risible
eg. in Feb webinar DM referred to conversion rate lifting from 40% to above 50%
what fiduciary investors (people managing money on behalf of others) are looking for is transparency of repeat empirical data points they can form their own views on- as it represents a discipline on mgt
if a mgt team wants to talk to conversion rate for eg as a key metric - fiduciary investors expect to see that metric repeatedly reported not cherry picked as a one off when it suits and esp not when its verbalised but not repeatedly committed to paper
and what ive told you as well is that mgt teams that drop occassional ad hoc data points they dont repeatedly display are renowned for doing so to carrot less skilled investors.
it doesnt mean all such mgt teams are gilding the lily - but because so many 'wannabe' stocks do it - pros tend to view it with contempt and disregard having been burnt before
and because of what BUD does for its core business offering - its even less well received
