You seem to know what you're talking about this...

You seem to know what you're talking about this industry...

Interested to hear more.

What kind of JV's are you talking about with TTT and what kind of potential $$$ are we talking?

In terms of the mmi grant, that's from the Aussie govt and -- from what other people have said -- AL3 potentially struck a deal with NASA (commercially confident) yesterday. If that's true, then we could get the same ~$2.3M grant for space-based applications from the Aussie govt.

You're right that AL3's printers are cheap...and by the looks of things...every Aussie uni (i.. Uni of Queenland, RMIT, etc) wants one. So, given this traction that we're getting now, we could -- potentially -- sell our printers to most major uni's around the world.

Now that the boarders are open, AL3 can promote our printers internationally...

Imagine if we sell 10 printers a year - that's $4-8M dollars (without ongoing licensing fees). We're already getting traction and the company has been held back due to COVID-19 travel restrictions to show case what they can do.

Finally, regarding your comment: "sure they are both in the same market if it came to large cylindrical objects of basic types of metal but TTT can do coatings, mix dissimilar metals, metals with embedded electronics all of which AL3 cannot do." This might be true (where did you read/ hear this). But, saying this, looking at TTT's recent presentation, it's Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing (CSAM) technology isn't proven yet, unlike AL3's WAAM technology (see page 7).

So TTT's 3D printers seem (for now) like a pipe dream, compared to AL3's printers which are being commercialised right now around the globe.

Looking forward to hearing your comments and answers to our questions.

To your first million,
-Trading For Millions