"They did not drill into surface outcropping, but drilled maybe 20-50m off them"Say what??
Sure, the first holes 1 through 5 were stepped out and drilled directly at TA1, which was the highest priority target.
This is normal practice but they were dusters and duds.
The previously headlined "50m wide pegmatite" was exaggerated width at surface because it was flat lying.
No 100m intercepts below that you had so confidently predicted.
Holes 6 and 7 gave the "best" mineralised widths, 2m and 2.8m, lol.
Hole 6 was opposite azi, straight down dip, an intentional classic director's special.
Contrary to what you say, both holes 6 and 7 were drilled directly on top of the "pegmatite mapped on surface" (see pink arrows).
Knowing it was a dud, the geo's then quickly moved on to the other targets.
After 23 holes they found something they could at least announce with the poor assays.
Stop making stuff up.
(20min delay)