Ann: Andover South preliminary structural interpretation, page-133

Bruha,

Is green thumbs, or inpatient, or do not understand greenfield discovery.

I go out sampling on field trips, I'll take up to 1000 samples.

All logged on gps, notes taken, and photographed.

Then at night, I'll spend all night panning down each sample, put it under the scope and update the gps log point.

Tedious and boring, but in my head discovery.

At the end I have a Google earth map with green diamonds, good hits, green circles ok, amber circles mediocre, and red squares, zero hits.

I end up with a neat heat map.

I loam, I look for sources, as every find, has its source.

The longest track I did, was 5km to an elluvial bench deposit for this particular river's gold.

Whilst everyone else was getting gold that trip, me zero. But I was looking at it differently to them.

I got over 100oz from that elluvial deposit, whilst others were getting a few grams in the Creek each trip

Here it's the same, put drill down, it leeds to discovery, next drill, more discovery, till viable.

Rdn have just started, and this campaign is for surface pass, to identify trends and dips.

Once that is done, the real stuff, following it down will begin.

At depth the lodes bulk up and in many places stacked lodes will converge.

To go over zone 1 properly, will take one year minimum I feel.

The folk that think daily, need to shift focus to what really is required at early greenfields.

I was hoping for ultramafic info today, drill locations etc.

But I think rdn plays this close to there chest, the last thing we want is a low ball take over bid.

If little released, harder for a potential suitor to work out what might be here.