Interesting, "Note: The Mineral Resource was estimated within...

Interesting, "Note: The Mineral Resource was estimated within constraining wireframe solids using a nominal 0.9% V2O5 lower cutoff for the basal massive magnetite zone and using a nominal 0.4% V2O5 lower cut-off for the banded and disseminated mineralisation zones. The Mineral Resource is quoted from all classified blocks within these wireframe solids above a lower cut-off grade of 0.4% V2O5. Differences may occur due to rounding."

In Comparison to AVL used 0.7% for high grade and 0.3% for low grade as cut offs for their JORC.

So a linear interpretation of MT resource says we now have about 30% less metal than AVL, albeit at higher avg grade, but I wonder if there would be any difference at all in the total metal resource if the cut off grade assumptions where the same? Probably not...

A comfortable few bags from here or more if you assume our MC should be on equivalent basis to AVL