I am afraid I need to point out a statement of yours which is...

I am afraid I need to point out a statement of yours which is false. The current drill program was under the current MDs watch. The potential issues I pointed out under the MDs watch. Did I express an opinion where I felt we should have drilled? NO! Did I express concerns on how the program may have been inadequate at testing full potential of the targets YES? Axe to grind? Possibly. Tell me if you had your savings to spend on testing a target in your back yard would you liked to have seen an adequate rig selected? Would you have liked the supervising geologist to continue drilling hrough the mineralisation? Would you have liked a cross section to show you if the targets were tested? I bloody demand excellence in my profession and I bloody demand excellence where my money is spent. Maybe my concerns are unfounded and wrong. I don't give a toss what gender the troops are and I give credit where it is due. David's Team did a monumental job in driving GRL forward and this needs to be carried on with. Carry on GRL.